Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ecology ; 103(9): e3738, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35567292

RESUMEN

The Amazon forest has the highest biodiversity on Earth. However, information on Amazonian vertebrate diversity is still deficient and scattered across the published, peer-reviewed, and gray literature and in unpublished raw data. Camera traps are an effective non-invasive method of surveying vertebrates, applicable to different scales of time and space. In this study, we organized and standardized camera trap records from different Amazon regions to compile the most extensive data set of inventories of mammal, bird, and reptile species ever assembled for the area. The complete data set comprises 154,123 records of 317 species (185 birds, 119 mammals, and 13 reptiles) gathered from surveys from the Amazonian portion of eight countries (Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Peru, Suriname, and Venezuela). The most frequently recorded species per taxa were: mammals: Cuniculus paca (11,907 records); birds: Pauxi tuberosa (3713 records); and reptiles: Tupinambis teguixin (716 records). The information detailed in this data paper opens up opportunities for new ecological studies at different spatial and temporal scales, allowing for a more accurate evaluation of the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, climate change, and other human-mediated defaunation processes in one of the most important and threatened tropical environments in the world. The data set is not copyright restricted; please cite this data paper when using its data in publications and we also request that researchers and educators inform us of how they are using these data.


Asunto(s)
Bosques , Mamíferos , Animales , Biodiversidad , Aves , Brasil , Humanos , Reptiles , Vertebrados
2.
Ecology ; 101(11): e03128, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32862433

RESUMEN

Mammalian carnivores are considered a key group in maintaining ecological health and can indicate potential ecological integrity in landscapes where they occur. Carnivores also hold high conservation value and their habitat requirements can guide management and conservation plans. The order Carnivora has 84 species from 8 families in the Neotropical region: Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Otariidae; Phocidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae. Herein, we include published and unpublished data on native terrestrial Neotropical carnivores (Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae). NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES is a publicly available data set that includes 99,605 data entries from 35,511 unique georeferenced coordinates. Detection/non-detection and quantitative data were obtained from 1818 to 2018 by researchers, governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and private consultants. Data were collected using several methods including camera trapping, museum collections, roadkill, line transect, and opportunistic records. Literature (peer-reviewed and grey literature) from Portuguese, Spanish and English were incorporated in this compilation. Most of the data set consists of detection data entries (n = 79,343; 79.7%) but also includes non-detection data (n = 20,262; 20.3%). Of those, 43.3% also include count data (n = 43,151). The information available in NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES will contribute to macroecological, ecological, and conservation questions in multiple spatio-temporal perspectives. As carnivores play key roles in trophic interactions, a better understanding of their distribution and habitat requirements are essential to establish conservation management plans and safeguard the future ecological health of Neotropical ecosystems. Our data paper, combined with other large-scale data sets, has great potential to clarify species distribution and related ecological processes within the Neotropics. There are no copyright restrictions and no restriction for using data from this data paper, as long as the data paper is cited as the source of the information used. We also request that users inform us of how they intend to use the data.


Asunto(s)
Canidae , Carnívoros , Mustelidae , Ursidae , Animales , Ecosistema , Humanos
3.
Nagy‐Reis, Mariana B.; Oshima, Júlia Emi de Faria; Kanda, Claudia Zukeran; Palmeira, Francesca Belem Lopes; Melo, Fabiano Rodrigues de; Morato, Ronaldo Gonçalves; Bonjorne, Lilian; Magioli, Marcelo; Leuchtenberger, Caroline; Rohe, Fabio; Lemos, Frederico Gemesio; Martello, Felipe; Alves‐Eigenheer, Milene; Silva, Rafaela Aparecida da; Santos, Juliana Silveira dos; Priante, Camila Fátima; Bernardo, Rodrigo; Rogeri, Patricia; Assis, Julia Camara; Gaspar, Lucas Pacciullio; Tonetti, Vinicius Rodrigues; Trinca, Cristiano Trapé; Ribeiro, Adauto de Souza; Bocchiglieri, Adriana; Hass, Adriani; Canteri, Adriano; Chiarello, Adriano Garcia; Paglia, Adriano Pereira; Pereira, Adriele Aparecida; Souza, Agnis Cristiane de; Gatica, Ailin; Medeiro, Akyllam Zoppi; Eriksson, Alan; Costa, Alan Nilo; González‐Gallina, Alberto; Yanosky, Alberto A; Cruz, Alejandro Jesus de la; Bertassoni, Alessandra; Bager, Alex; Bovo, Alex Augusto Abreu; Mol, Alexandra Cravino; Bezerra, Alexandra Maria Ramos; Percequillo, Alexandre; Vogliotti, Alexandre; Lopes, Alexandre Martins Costa; Keuroghlian, Alexine; Hartley, Alfonso Christopher Zúñiga; Devlin, Allison L.; Paula, Almir de; García‐Olaechea, Alvaro; Sánchez, Amadeo; Aquino, Ana Carla Medeiros Morato; Srbek‐Araujo, Ana Carolina; Ochoa, Ana Cecilia; Tomazzoni, Ana Cristina; Lacerda, Ana Cristyna Reis; Bacellar, Ana Elisa de Faria; Campelo, Ana Kellen Nogueira; Victoria, Ana María Herrera; Paschoal, Ana Maria de Oliveira; Potrich, Ana Paula; Gomes, Ana Paula Nascimento; Olímpio, Ana Priscila Medeiros; Costa, Ana Raissa Cunha; Jácomo, Anah Tereza de Almeida; Calaça, Analice Maria; Jesus, Anamélia Souza; Barban, Ananda de Barros; Feijó, Anderson; Pagoto, Anderson; Rolim, Anderson Claudino; Hermann, Andiara Paula; Souza, Andiara Silos Moraes de Castro e; Alonso, André Chein; Monteiro, André; Mendonça, André Faria; Luza, André Luís; Moura, André Luis Botelho; Silva, André Luiz Ferreira da; Lanna, Andre Monnerat; Antunes, Andre Pinassi; Nunes, André Valle; Dechner, Andrea; Carvalho, Andrea Siqueira; Novaro, Andres Jose; Scabin, Andressa Barbara; Gatti, Andressa; Nobre, Andrezza Bellotto; Montanarin, Anelise; Deffaci, Ângela Camila; Albuquerque, Anna Carolina Figueiredo de; Mangione, Antonio Marcelo; Pinto, Antonio Millas Silva; Pontes, Antonio Rossano Mendes; Bertoldi, Ariane Teixeira; Calouro, Armando Muniz; Fernandes, Arthur; Ferreira, Arystene Nicodemo; Ferreguetti, Atilla Colombo; Rosa, Augusto Lisboa Martins; Banhos, Aureo; Francisco, Beatriz da Silva de Souza; Cezila, Beatriz Azevedo; Beisiegel, Beatriz de Mello; Thoisy, Benoit de; Ingberman, Bianca; Neves, Bianca dos Santos; Pereira‐Silva, Brenda; Camargo, Bruna Bertagni de; Andrade, Bruna da Silva; Santos, Bruna Silva; Leles, Bruno; Campos, Bruno Augusto Torres Parahyba; Kubiak, Bruno Busnello; França, Bruno Rodrigo de Albuquerque; Saranholi, Bruno Henrique; Mendes, Calebe Pereira; Devids, Camila Cantagallo; Pianca, Camila; Rodrigues, Camila; Islas, Camila Alvez; Lima, Camilla Angélica de; Lima, Camilo Ribeiro de; Gestich, Carla Cristina; Tedesco, Carla Denise; Angelo, Carlos De; Fonseca, Carlos; Hass, Carlos; Peres, Carlos A.; Kasper, Carlos Benhur; Durigan, Carlos Cesar; Fragoso, Carlos Eduardo; Verona, Carlos Eduardo; Rocha, Carlos Frederico Duarte; Salvador, Carlos Henrique; Vieira, Carlos Leonardo; Ruiz, Carmen Elena Barragán; Cheida, Carolina Carvalho; Sartor, Caroline Charão; Espinosa, Caroline da Costa; Fieker, Carolline Zatta; Braga, Caryne; Sánchez‐Lalinde, Catalina; Machado, Cauanne Iglesias Campos; Cronemberger, Cecilia; Luna, Cecília Licarião; Vechio, Christine Del; Bernardo, Christine Steiner S.; Hurtado, Cindy Meliza; Lopes, Cíntia M.; Rosa, Clarissa Alves da; Cinta, Claudia Cristina; Costa, Claudia Guimaraes; Zárate‐Castañeda, Claudia Paola; Novaes, Claudio Leite; Jenkins, Clinton N.; Seixas, Cristiana Simão; Martin, Cristiane; Zaniratto, Cristiane Patrícia; López‐Fuerte, Cristina Fabiola; Cunha, Cristina Jaques da; Brito De‐Carvalho, Crizanto; Chávez, Cuauhtémoc; Santos, Cyntia Cavalcante; Polli, Daiana Jeronimo; Buscariol, Daiane; Carreira, Daiane Cristina; Galiano, Daniel; Thornton, Daniel; Ferraz, Daniel da Silva; Lamattina, Daniela; Moreno, Daniele Janina; Moreira, Danielle Oliveira; Farias, Danilo Augusto; Barros‐Battesti, Darci Moraes; Tavares, Davi Castro; Braga, David Costa; Gaspar, Denise Alemar; Friedeberg, Diana; Astúa, Diego; Silva, Diego Afonso; Viana, Diego Carvalho; Lizcano, Diego J.; Varela, Diego M.; Jacinavicius, Fernando de Castro; Andrade, Gabrielle Ribeiro de; Almeida, Maria Cristina Ferreira do Rosário; Onofrio, Valeria Castilho.
Ecology, v. 101, n. 11, e03128, nov. 2020
Artículo en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IBPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: bud-3174

RESUMEN

Mammalian carnivores are considered a key group in maintaining ecological health and can indicate potential ecological integrity in landscapes where they occur. Carnivores also hold high conservation value and their habitat requirements can guide management and conservation plans. The order Carnivora has 84 species from 8 families in the Neotropical region: Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Otariidae; Phocidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae. Herein, we include published and unpublished data on native terrestrial Neotropical carnivores (Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae). NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES is a publicly available data set that includes 99,605 data entries from 35,511 unique georeferenced coordinates. Detection/non‐detection and quantitative data were obtained from 1818 to 2018 by researchers, governmental agencies, non‐governmental organizations, and private consultants. Data were collected using several methods including camera trapping, museum collections, roadkill, line transect, and opportunistic records. Literature (peerreviewed and grey literature) from Portuguese, Spanish and English were incorporated in this compilation. Most of the data set consists of detection data entries (n = 79,343; 79.7%) but also includes non‐detection data (n = 20,262; 20.3%). Of those, 43.3% also include count data (n = 43,151). The information available in NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES will contribute to macroecological, ecological, and conservation questions in multiple spatio‐temporal perspectives. As carnivores play key roles in trophic interactions, a better understanding of their distribution and habitat requirements are essential to establish conservation management plans and safeguard the future ecological health of Neotropical ecosystems. Our data paper, combined with other largescale data sets, has great potential to clarify species distribution and related ecological processes within the Neotropics. There are no copyright restrictions and no restriction for using data from this data paper, as long as the data paper is cited as the source of the information used. We also request that users inform us of how they intend to use the data.

4.
Environ Manage ; 56(4): 903-15, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26092051

RESUMEN

We evaluated local opinion about reducing livestock losses to puma (Puma concolor) and the potential for conflict among livestock breeders inside a protected area in the highlands of a southeastern Brazilian Atlantic forest. We also quantified the number and type of livestock losses, and determined if predation by puma was correlated with property profile and landscape characteristics. We conducted semistructured interviews with 42 livestock breeders sampled in 36 rural properties. When asked how to reduce predation, 33% of livestock breeders refused to answer, 26% suggested improving livestock husbandry practices, 19% stated that there was no appropriate action, 17% favored removing the "problem" individual, and 5 % suggested killing the puma. Opinion on how to solve predation was independent of herd size and history of losses, and was correlated with respondent age class. Older respondents tended to suggest removing or killing pumas. Attitudes toward predation represented high potential for conflict among livestock breeders who demonstrated high discordance among responses. Horses were the most common prey (51%), followed by cattle (28%), sheep (17%), and goats (4%); totaling 47 animals attacked between 2004 and 2007. Annual predation was approximately 12 ± 5 animals, equivalent to 0.4% of the total livestock. Property elevation and distance from the urban center were the main predictors of predation probability. This survey used a novel approach that has not been addressed directly in other studies on livestock predation and demonstrated that the high potential for conflict among livestock breeders should be considered before implementing management actions.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Ganado , Conducta Predatoria/fisiología , Puma/fisiología , Animales , Brasil , Bovinos , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Bosques , Cabras , Caballos , Densidad de Población , Ovinos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...